To the editor:

In Fridaysa国际传媒檚 issue, you published a entitled sa国际传媒淲e are not responsible for climate change.sa国际传媒�

The title is wrong; we ARE responsible as the IPCC report which he so derides makes clear.

Re: carbon tax: The BC Liberals have it right on this one. The carbon tax helps reduce the amount of carbon used and is accompanied by a reduction in other taxes. Itsa国际传媒檚 a win-win. Many jurisdictions (Alberta and Ontario, for example) use the carbon tax money for infrastructure or general revenue; B.C. does not.

Re: the Lord Monckton Foundation: This foundation appears to be the mouthpiece for a climate change denier who has no scientific background. I would suggest that we accept its pronouncements with many grains of salt.

Re: the Global Warming Petition Project: This American project reports it has been signed by 31,487 American scientists and engineers. That sounds like a lot of support but a quick Google search reports that in 2012 6.2 million people were employed in the United States as scientists and engineers. Thus those who support this petition are a very small portion (one half of one per cent) of American scientists and engineers. Other reports say that 95 per cent of scientists and engineers support the IPCC findings.

It is very interesting that this letter appears as parts of the Okanagan are being flooded. Welcome to climate change and get used to it!

By the way, I recall reading that sa国际传媒済lobal warmingsa国际传媒� is a term developed by an advertising person. sa国际传媒淕lobal warmingsa国际传媒� has a certainty to it that sa国际传媒渃limate changesa国际传媒� does not. But sa国际传媒渃limate changesa国际传媒� is the correct term as some areas will be warmer and some cooler, some wetter and some drier. Heraclitus said that sa国际传媒淐hange is the only constant.sa国际传媒� Get used to it, change is here and more is coming.

Rick Gee, Kelowna