sa国际传媒

Skip to content

Developer to challenge action after Kelowna council pulls contentious permit

sa国际传媒榃esa国际传媒檒l use the tools available to us to challenge this actionsa国际传媒
33596594_web1_230814-KCN-35-doyle-pulled-council_1
Kelowna council has rescinded the development permit for a 25-storey tower planned for 350 Doyle Ave. (Gary Barnes/Capital News)

At its Aug. 14 regular meeting, Kelowna council pulled the development permit for a 25-storey tower planned for 350 Doyle Avenue, the site of the old RCMP detachment.

After a staff report outlining concerns that several speakers at a public hearing on the project were paid a per diem for their appearance, council voted unanimously to rescind the permit.

sa国际传媒淭wo of the players (council and the public) were unaware payments were made,sa国际传媒 said Stephen Flemming, city clerk. sa国际传媒淭he rules of the game were tilted in a way that two of the three parties were not aware.sa国际传媒

READ MORE: Dollars given to supporters of Doyle development at Kelowna public hearing

Council included in its decision an invitation to the developer, Appelt Properties, to reapply for a permit.

CEO Greg Appelt attended the meeting remotely.

sa国际传媒淭his has been a profoundly disappointing turn of events,sa国际传媒 said Appelt. sa国际传媒淚t has taken considerable work and dollars to bring this project to the development permit stage.sa国际传媒

Appelt noted that his company has been transparent and has not hidden the per diem issue.

sa国际传媒淲e have not broken any rules or laws. Can we really pretend that students, who were paid a per diem, tainted this process?sa国际传媒

Appelt also said that well-funded opposition to the development was well represented at the public hearing, and cautioned council about rescinding the development permit.

sa国际传媒淲esa国际传媒檒l use the tools available to us to challenge this action,sa国际传媒 he added.

At the end of his comment Appelt said he would not take any questions from council.

Mayor Tom Dyas also spoke to reporters after the meeting.

sa国际传媒淚 can say that the information we released, outlining why we had the hearing and what staff had completed today and the communications back and forth between Appelt Properties, are kind of the guiding principles of why that motion was brought forward today. The view I think we took was one that we were concerned that it was a tainted process and thatsa国际传媒檚 what we voted on.sa国际传媒



gary.barnes@kelownacapnews.com

Like us on and follow us on and subscribe to our daily newsletter.



Gary Barnes

About the Author: Gary Barnes

Journalist and broadcaster for three decades.
Read more



(or

sa国际传媒

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }