Police watchdog clears Mountie in 2020 chaotic Lake Country traffic stop

After criminal court proceedings, B.C.sa国际传媒檚 police watchdog has determined for a second time that a RCMP officer did not commit any offense during an incident that occurred in Lake Country in 2020.

The Independent Investigations Office (IIO) of B.C. originally put out its report on the matter on March 23, 2021 stating the officer didnsa国际传媒檛 commit an offence but after court proceedings, it has been confirmed again because of insufficient evidence.

In the IIOsa国际传媒檚 newest report, the parties involved are not named. The names are public record from a civil claim filed to B.C. Supreme Court on Sept. 24, 2020.

The incident under investigation by the IIO took place on Sept. 11, 2020, on Highway 97 near Lodge Road. Dustin Blondin was arrested for speeding after being caught travelling 120 km/h in a 70 km/h zone, Const. Julius Prommer. During the arrest, an altercation took place and Blondin claimed Prommer used unreasonable force and broke Blondinsa国际传媒檚 arm.

Prommer told investigators that Blondinsa国际传媒檚 reaction to being pulled over and being told his car could be impounded was sa国际传媒渁ngry, belligerent, and objective.sa国际传媒� He also stated that Blondin was videoing himself sa国际传媒渨hile pushing his face into [Prommersa国际传媒檚] flashlight and yelling sa国际传媒榶ou assaulted mesa国际传媒�.sa国际传媒�

Prommer also claimed that besides when Blondin pushed himself into the flashlight, there was no other physical contact until another officer arrived.

Prommer denied squeezing Blondinsa国际传媒檚 hand but did acknowledge that he had to restrain him in the backseat of his police vehicle by sa国际传媒渃ontrolling his shoulders and rolling himsa国际传媒� to search Blondin and seize his cell phone.

After the event, Blondin was diagnosed with a spiral fracture in his left hand, which required surgery.

Blondin did acknowledge he was driving too fast at the time of the incident but upon meeting Prommer, stated he could tell he was sa国际传媒渘ot in a good mood that day.sa国际传媒�

When Prommer asked for Blondinsa国际传媒檚 driversa国际传媒檚 license, Blondin said his driversa国际传媒檚 license was stolen, which IIO investigated and discovered to be true.

During the arrest, Blondin admitted to resisting being taken to the ground but Prommer sa国际传媒渇lipped outsa国际传媒� and grabbed Blondinsa国际传媒檚 cuffed hands.

While being transported to the RCMP detachment, Blondin, while handcuffed, used his smartwatch to call 911. In the phone call, Blondin claims his hand was broken and his face was sa国际传媒渟mashed on the pavement.sa国际传媒�

At the detachment, after being fingerprinted, he was given his phone back and spoke to a legal aid lawyer, who didnsa国际传媒檛 take his case.

During the investigation, Blondin provided officers with the video up to when Prommer told Blondin to stop shining his cell phone. Blondin didnsa国际传媒檛 provide a video of a flashlight hitting him in the eye, as he claimed.

A tow truck driver who arrived at the scene to take Blondinsa国际传媒檚 vehicle told investigators he saw Blondin sa国际传媒渢rying to obstructsa国际传媒� the officers at the scene. The tow truck driver looked away from the scene and when he looked back, Blondin was on the ground being handcuffed. He confirmed Blondin was yelling and screaming and stating the officer broke his arm.

Following this second investigation by the IIO, it was again determined there was insufficient evidence to say the force used was unreasonable.

It was concluded there was no problem with the original offence as Blondin was speeding significantly.

Chief civilian director Ronald J MacDonald stated that the inconsistencies in the evidence are the fact that the injury to Blondinsa国际传媒檚 hand is a spiral fracture, sa国际传媒渕ore likely the result of a twisting force than a crushing one.sa国际传媒�

MacDonald found there was significant evidence from the second arriving officer to conclude the injury was most likely caused by the struggle to get Blondinsa国际传媒檚 arms under control and into restraints during the arrest.

sa国际传媒淚t might have been the indirect result of the efforts of either of the two officers but in any event does not appear to have been caused by any unjustified or excessive use of force, in the circumstance,sa国际传媒� he said.

MacDonald added that he did not consider there to be reasonable grounds to believe an officer committed an office under any enactment and therefore the matter would not be referred to the Crown Council for consideration of charges.

sa国际传媒淭he bottom line is that [Blondin]sa国际传媒檚 evidence suffers from reliability issues, and contradicts other known evidence,sa国际传媒� said MacDonald. sa国际传媒淲hile the evidence from Prommer is incomplete when considering the totality of the matter, there is insufficient evidence to say that force used was unreasonable.sa国际传媒�

sa国际传媒